the hypocrisy goes on and on
I found an interesting article :
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1115460773931&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968705899037&t=TS_Home&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes
Now, I have never come in contact with any church like this, and its wrong. The liberals on hanchetts site once criticized me on this. but of course thier hypocrites.
nathandave said:
"Anyway, I think your gonna have to accept it. They are finished on this blog and I say Amen, thank you Lord."
Well, the republicans get banned once again!
living positive said:
"Jasper, you were banned for your language and verbal abuse."
What about tenacious, or 322, or shadow? It is obvious that your only trying to ban those who disagree with you.
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1115460773931&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968705899037&t=TS_Home&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes
Now, I have never come in contact with any church like this, and its wrong. The liberals on hanchetts site once criticized me on this. but of course thier hypocrites.
nathandave said:
"Anyway, I think your gonna have to accept it. They are finished on this blog and I say Amen, thank you Lord."
Well, the republicans get banned once again!
living positive said:
"Jasper, you were banned for your language and verbal abuse."
What about tenacious, or 322, or shadow? It is obvious that your only trying to ban those who disagree with you.
11 Comments:
sounds familiar?
"I hate to see the church suffer like that," she said. "God doesn't care whether you're a Republican or a Democrat. It just hurts to see that going on.''
God is NEVER DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN...
exactly! thats what ive been thinking all along! peterz thinks because im joining the military im going to die there and go to hell because i support bush! thats a very good point.
The military is not about serving the country it is serving the Big Banks like Rockefeller, Bush, Clinton, Gingrich, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, and Braufmans. You should think aboutn it before taking the chance. Do not believe what they say about going to the military.
You should look at all the history here ALL from Nixon, Johnson, Clinton, Eisenhower who is a 33rd degree mason are ALL part of the same program. Pearl Harbor was in reality had foreknowledge but Eisenshower withheld information and knew Japan was going to hit Pearl Harbor. He actually let it happen in WWII. History is never repeated it's been preplanned engineered and executed.
Bush is no different than the rest of them. Father Bush, Bush, Reagan, Soros, Walters, Rather, Brokaw David Gergen are all part of the CFR/Bilderbergers or the Trilateral Commission.
Did you have any clue when Clinton did the whole environmental acts in Rio then at the Same time he and Gingrich secretly established the WTO allowing more corporations to break laws in trading food. That whole monica lewinsky is just a cover up. Clinton is actually doing a favor for Rockfeller who is also skull and bones.
We are not discussing a liberal/democrat issue we are discussing about our basic freedom. The globalists are ran by major corps that control both parties, the senate, house, and the judiciary. As long as they serve to the billionaires running the world they will be fine....
god abhores war...and it abhores colonialism. This is what this country is heading towards a downpath. Ottman's statement about Soros about democrat does not mean anything but being part of the CFR is a complete issue. If we are supposed to be a country of sovereignty then why are all of the american companies are going overseas well it is very simple cheap labor then they export it back into the tariffs basically breaking all rules thanks to WTO and completely profiteering it from us freeloving americans...
Think about it...
Beaware of phonies of both sides of the spectrum (left and right), they will not tell you in person this is about companies like Lucis Trust, Lucent Technologies, and people like Horowitz, Coulter, Mother Jones, and Fords who are all ran by the same people.
Phony Conservatives and Liberals
Fabian Socialists: David Horowitz and Ann Coulter
by TERRY HAYFIELD
Fabian Socialists: David Horowitz and Ann Coulter There is a "Third Kind" living amongst us in this Republic. This
"Third Kind" comes in a political package disguising themselves as
Republicans, or World Conservatives of the International Democrat Union and Democrats, or World Liberals of The Third Way.
The "Third Kind" wants to establish a self-regulating classless society on planet earth. I have had radio encounters with two Republican members of the "Third Kind," Ann Coulter (author of the best seller Slander) and David Horowitz (author of Empire and Revolution and How to Beat the Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas).
People such as Coulter and Horowitz do not want to talk about the very real existence of the "Third Kind" nor do they want you to know what is really taking place in this Republic and the world.
The "Third Kind" is actually the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC). The
Radical Capitalist Class is a group of people that are trying desperately to spread a very specific American/British Capitalism based on Fabian Socialism to encompass the globe.
More phony right
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=99&contentid=1016
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=99&contentid=964&page=2
follow this link
and that link http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=109&contentid=2159
and http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=80&contentid=2230
and please check infowars.com
and a few phony left to show you the REAL pic...
Aaah look the Federal Reserve
Abolish the Federal Reserve
by REP. RON PAUL
Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation to restore financial stability to America's economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. I also ask unanimous consent to insert the attached article by Lew Rockwell, president of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which explains the benefits of abolishing the Fed and restoring the gold standard, into the record.
Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people.
From the Great Depression, to the stagflation of the seventies, to the burst of the dotcom bubble last year, every economic downturn suffered by the country over the last 80 years can be traced to Federal Reserve policy. The Fed has followed a consistent policy of flooding the economy with easy money, leading to a misallocation of resources and an artificial "boom" followed by a recession or depression when the Fed-created bubble bursts.
With a stable currency, American exporters will no longer be held hostage to an erratic monetary policy. Stabilizing the currency will also give Americans new incentives to save as they will no longer have to fear inflation eroding their savings. Those members concerned about increasing America's exports or the low rate of savings should be enthusiastic supporters of this legislation.
Though the Federal Reserve policy harms the average American, it benefits those in a position to take advantage of the cycles in monetary policy. The main beneficiaries are those who receive access to artificially inflated money and/or credit before the inflationary effects of the policy impact the entire economy. Federal Reserve policies also benefit big spending politicians who use the inflated currency created by the Fed to hide the true costs of the welfare-warfare state. It is time for Congress to put the interests of the American people ahead of the special interests and their own appetite for big government.
Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary policy. The United States Constitution grants to Congress the authority to coin money and regulate the value of the currency. The Constitution does not give Congress the authority to delegate control over monetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, the Constitution certainly does not empower the federal government to erode the American standard of living via an inflationary monetary policy.
In fact, Congress' constitutional mandate regarding monetary policy should only permit currency backed by stable commodities such as silver and gold to be used as legal tender. Therefore, abolishing the Federal Reserve and returning to a constitutional system will enable America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our nation's founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold. Such a monetary system is the basis of a true free-market economy.
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up for working Americans by putting an end to the manipulation of the money supply which erodes Americans' standard of living, enlarges big government, and enriches well-connected elites, by cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve.
WHY GOLD?
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
As with all matters of investment, everything is clear in hindsight. Had you bought gold mutual funds earlier this year, they might have appreciated more than 100 percent. Gold has risen $60 since March 2001 to the latest spot price of $326.
Why wasn't it obvious? The Fed has been inflating the dollar as never before, driving interest rates down to absurdly low levels, even as the federal government has been pushing a mercantile trade policy, and New York City, the hub of the world economy, continues to be threatened by terrorism. The government is failing to prevent more successful attacks by not backing down from foreign policy disasters and by not allowing planes to arm themselves. These are all conditions that make gold particularly attractive.
Or perhaps it is not so obvious why this is true. It's been three decades since the dollar's tie to gold was completely severed, to the hosannas of mainstream economists. There is no stash of gold held by the Fed or the Treasury that backs our currency system. The government owns gold but not as a monetary asset. It owns it the same way it owns national parks and fighter planes. It's just another asset the government keeps to itself.
The dollar, and all our money, is nothing more and nothing less than what it looks like: a cut piece of linen paper with fancy printing on it. You can exchange it for other currency at a fixed rate and for any good or service at a flexible rate. But there is no established exchange rate between the dollar and gold, either at home or internationally.
The supply of money is not limited by the amount of gold. Gold is just another good for which the dollar can be exchanged, and in that sense is legally no different from a gallon of milk, a tank of gas, or an hour of babysitting services.
Why, then, do people turn to gold in times like these? What is gold used for? Yes, there are industrial uses and there are consumer uses in jewelry and the like. But recessions and inflations don't cause people to want to wear more jewelry or stock up on industrial metal. The investor demand ultimately reflects consumer demand for gold. But that still leaves us with the question of why the consumer demand exists in the first place. Why gold and not sugar or wheat or something else?
There is no getting away from it: investor markets have memories of the days when gold was money. In fact, in the whole history of civilization, gold has served as the basic money of all people wherever it's been available. Other precious metals have been valued and coined, but gold always emerged on top in the great competition for what constitutes the most valuable commodity of all.
There is nothing intrinsic about gold that makes it money. It has certain properties that lend itself to monetary use, like portability, divisibility, scarcity, durability, and uniformity. But these are just descriptors of certain qualities of the metal, not explanations as to why it became money. Gold became money for only one reason: because that's what the markets chose.
Why isn't gold money now? Because governments destroyed the gold standard. Why? Because they regarded it as too inflexible. To be sure, monetary inflexibility is the friend of free markets. Without the ability to create money out of nothing, governments tend to run tight financial ships. Banks are more careful about the lending when they can't rely on a lender of last resort with access to a money-creation machine like the Fed.
A fixed money stock means that overall prices are generally more stable. The problems of inflation and business cycles disappear entirely. Under the gold standard, in fact, increased market productivity causes prices to generally decline over time as the purchasing power of money increases.
In 1967, Alan Greenspan once wrote an article called Gold and Economic Freedom. He wrote that:
"An almost hysterical antagonism toward the gold standard is one issue which unites statists of all persuasions. They seem to sense--perhaps more clearly and subtly than many consistent defenders of laissez-faire--that gold and economic freedom are inseparable, that the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and that each implies and requires the other. . . . This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights."
He was right. Gold and freedom go together. Gold money is both the result of freedom and its leading protector. When money is as good as gold, the government cannot manipulate the supply for its own purposes. Just as the rule of law puts limits on the despotic use of police power, a gold standard puts extreme limits on the government's ability to spend, borrow, and otherwise create crazy unworkable programs. It is forced to raise its revenue through taxation, not inflation, and generally keep its house in order.
Without the gold standard, government is free to work with the Fed to inflate the currency without limit. Even in our own times, we've seen governments do that and thereby spread mass misery.
Now, all governments are stupid but not all are so stupid as to pull stunts like this. Most of the time, governments are pleased to inflate their currencies so long as they don't have to pay the price in the form of mass bankruptcies, falling exchange rates, and inflation.
In the real world, of course, there is a lag time between cause and effect. The Fed has been inflating the currency at very high levels for longer than a year. The consequences of this disastrous policy are showing up only recently in the form of a falling dollar and higher gold prices. And so what does the Fed do? It is pulling back now. For the first time in nearly ten years, some measures of money (M2 and MZM) are showing a falling money stock, which is likely to prompt a second dip in the continuing recession.
Greenspan now finds himself on the horns of a very serious dilemma. If he continues to pull back on money, the economy could tip into a serious recession. This is especially a danger given rising protectionism, which mirrors the events of the early 1930s. On the other hand, a continuation of the loose policy he has pursued for a year endangers the value of the dollar overseas.
How much easier matters were when we didn't have to rely on the wisdom of exalted monetary central planners like Greenspan. Under the gold standard, the supply of money regulated itself. The government kept within limits. Banks were more cautious. Savings were high because credit was tight and saving was rewarded. This approach to economics is the foundation of a sustainable prosperity.
We don't have that system now for the country or the world, but individuals are showing their preferences once again. By driving up the price of gold, prompting gold producers to become profitable again, the people are expressing their lack of confidence in their leaders. They have decided to protect themselves and not trust the state. That is the hidden message behind the new luster of gold.
Is a gold standard feasible again? Of course. The dollar could be redefined in terms of gold. Interest rates would reflect the real supply and demand for credit. We could shut down the Fed and we would never need to worry again what the chairman of the Fed wanted. There was a time when Greenspan was nostalgic for such a system. Investors of the world have come to embrace this view even as Greenspan has completely abandoned it.
What keeps the gold standard from becoming a reality agaagain is the love of big government and war. If we ever fall in love with freedom again, the gold standard will once more become a hot issue in public debate.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr091002b.htm
ABOLISH THE FEDERAL RESERVE
Congressman Ron Paul
U.S. House of Representatives
September 10, 2002
The reason everybody attacks right wing talk show hosts personally is because THEY DOMINATE EVERY SINGLE ISSUE THEY COVER. which is basically, all the issues. Just look at
http://rush-limbaugh.net/
I think that site is pretty funny...
BTW I don't Rush's show seriously. He's a complete joke just like these so called right wingers.
Rush is a hypocrite and so is O'Reilly, Hannity, and coulter. I can go on about all of them so called talk shows/preachers. They are being paid to lie about what's going on since they have a warped view of the world. Imagine if O'reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Rush, David Limbaugh, Laura Inghram, Dr. Laura, and all of those Televangelists were in one room and one Mic. They would fight over it too see who has the biggest powertrip...
See and all you can do is attack them personally because they dominate all issues and all you can all them is powertrippers or liars. liars? give me proof.
You are missing the point here...they are paid to lie and set on a good show, that's why I do not take guys like them seriously.
O'Reilly-How many times he rudely tells people to shut up? Even though he say the shut up line one time? He is a pathological liar. It was caught on tape no doubts about it. His arrogance shows how much of a one track mind he has.
Coulter-Man or Woman? Or can it be Arthur Coltrane? This it/woman/man is nothing more than a vacuous hateful person who spews the propoganda and paid by Karl Rove. Please read the article about the phony left right.
Rush-Definitely a hypocrite and he lauds this propoganda such as the patriot act. The definition of low life has reached to an all new level. While at the same time he was taken in by the authorities and whining about taking out transactions below 10k. Only to support his oxycotin habits. His own propoganda and lauds of the patriot act now he's complaining about it?
Hannity-his lack of logic and unpresentable anti liberal rhetorics and pro bush propoganda that has nothing to do with this country's downfall. He spewed away from Mr. Rangel's topic on the Project of the New American Century. Calling Rangel a conspiract even though it was set in stone by Wolfowitz, Rummy, Jeb Bush and Cheney who the planned it for more than 10 years. I think you would ignore about the PNAC as another sort of conspiracy.
Inghram-same propoganda...
Schlussel-She is a paid informant to the CIA on her propoganda on terrorism. In addition she promotes Zionism in a self righteous manner. Her Bio are not only filled with neo con drivel but also more of a spy for the FBI/CIA. What does it mean she's being PAID. That whole terror thing is completely out of context.
Why should I say I am personally attacking them? I am providing you legitimate reasons why they are hypocrites and liars. Since you posted your reasons on the Iraq war, I valued it as pittance. Something that would equate to their agenda
Post a Comment
<< Home