Micheal Moore is an Idiot!

Now as you can tell by this post's title, I really, really dislike micheal moore. For those of you who do like him, please, keep reading.

After the attacks of 9/11, micheal moore wrote this lovely message on his website.

"Many families have been devastated tonight. This just is not right. They did not deserve to die. If someone did this to get back at Bush, then they did so by killing thousands of people who DID NOT VOTE for him! Boston, New York, DC, and the planes' destination of California--these were places that voted AGAINST Bush!"

Can you imagine if rush limbaugh would had said something like this? Not even the lunatic fringe would have embraced him. But Micheal says something this stupid and it doesnt even register with cultural elites as out of line and idiotic. Liberals praise him and think of him as a national treasure. Trust me, Micheal Moore isnt a joke to the rest of the world. Thousands of mainstream liberals are now idolizing this guy!

Lets take a look at where hes popular now. France! And what does france have to say about fighting terrorism? They say that if we dont stop the killing, then they will make an alliance with the terrorists against us! I mean, can it get any more loonier?!?

I sometimes wonder whats happening to the world.

In-vitro Fertilization

It has come to my attention that there is a big problem with in-vitro Fertalization. Take a look at what this is:

"Their goal is to impregnate women who otherwise would not be able to have a child. The procedure involves:

Giving special medication to the woman that results in the development, growth, and maturation of eggs in a woman's ovaries.
Extracting perhaps 24 mature mature ova (aka oocytes) from the woman's ovaries.
Fertilizing the ova with sperm, typically from her husband or an anonymous donor.
Placing the embryos in a special incubator which encourages their growth.
Selecting two to four healthy-looking embryos and implanting them in the woman's uterus.
Disposing of the remaining 20 or so surplus embryos in some manner."

This is wrong! God is frowning upon this site! everytime people do this they are killing 20 Humans! This is 20 kids that will never walk thier first step, 20 kids that will never be able to have a family, 20 kids that will never be able to experience life! This is playing god! As Herman b. Hayes, from Conservatives from American Values said, "We must keep every embryo ever taken from the ovaries in perfect live condition until the Good Holy Oh God Jesus returns, or else we are all guilty of mass murder."

Maybe Pro Life people are ignoring the problem? In my eyes, and in gods eyes, this is a lot worse than abortion. Although Im pretty sure that the people can be unanimously decided together on this. The problem is a lot of people still support abortion. We need to rid the world of this evil, I believe we can do it if we unify the church.

Bushislord.com

One of hanchetts points for bush being the antichrist is that people will be worshipping the antichrist. His proof for people worshiping bush is bushislord.com . well, its believable right? Well, im sure hanchett knows about what im about to tell you, but he doesnt want the truth revealed. I want you all to do something right now. Go to bushislord.com . on the side bar it will say good christians, and it will list condi rice, rush limbaugh, ect. Click on rush limbaugh. it will lead you to this site.

http://rush-limbaugh.net/

now if bushislord has a link to that site, then I dont think that theyre serious, do you? no, I didnt think so. I posted these instructions on hanchetts site, but he delete it. Which shows that he is the real false prophet, wanting his followers to believe in his lies. its too bad.

Dreams

"THURSDAY, July 26 (HealthScoutNews) -- To sleep, perchance to have nightmares. That may be your lot in life if you're a conservative Republican, while your liberal Democrat friends enjoy nightly flights of fancy.
A California researcher says his study suggests that your political views may predict the trends in your dreams.
Kelly Bulkeley, an author and lecturer on dream research at California's Santa Clara University, says, "The people on the right were much more likely to have nightmares than people on the left. Their nightmares had more fear, aggression and helplessness, while the scary stuff among people on the left was moderated by other elements that offered some possibility of hope or power to deal with a frightening situation."

In his study, Bulkeley asked 56 students about their political beliefs: "I picked just the people who were ideologically pure, people definitively on the left or right."
He found 14 conservatives and 14 liberals on the far sides of the political spectrum. He then asked them about the most recent dream they remembered. "Given a couple minutes, most people will remember something," he says.
"There's a lot of evidence to suggest that learning about a single dream gives you a good picture of a person's dream life," though he says more can be learned by the more difficult task of tracking dreams over several weeks.
Bulkeley discussed his findings recently at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Dreams at the University of California (UC) at Santa Cruz.
He says the conservative people reported frightening dreams of family members being murdered and of threats to children. One man dreamed his hair fell out, and he couldn't do anything about it.
"The people on the left tended to have dreams that were more bizarre and fanciful, with more unusual settings, characters and actions," Bulkeley says.
People on the left weren't immune to nightmares, but their dreams were different, he says. One young man dreamed about being in a room with a huge telephone keypad that he had to press in a specific order. "Unlike some of the nightmares on the right, where there's utter bleakness or despair, he has three friends telling him how to do it up on a balcony," Bulkeley says.
While the differences between conservative and liberal dreams are clear, the reasons for them aren't, Bulkeley says.
"Maybe they reflect greater inner conflict (in conservatives). They're more anxious or insecure, and people on the left are more secure, less anxious and more imaginative or creative," he says.
Or, he says Republicans simply could have a better handle on the world.
"As my conservative friends like to point out, it may be that people on the right have a greater realism, a sensitivity to the threats and dangers out there in the world, while people on the left are irrational and caught up in their own fantasies. Their heads are off in the clouds," he says.
Bulkeley acknowledges his study was small, while another dream expert says more research clearly is needed.
Veronica Tonay, a psychology instructor at UC Santa Cruz, says, "People's dreams reflect their similarities and differences, and they do reflect waking concerns."
"Maybe Republicans feel under threat in some way, while Democrats seem to be seeking more harmony," she says.
No matter whom you vote for, nightmares are entirely normal; feelings of fear or anxiety make their way into 65 percent of dreams, Tonay says.
"Nobody knows what the function of dreams are, but we hypothesize that they serve as some type of emotional balancing function," she says. "They clear your mind of stuff that's been emotionally charged. If you have extreme emotions during the day, and you're not aware of them, you'll have them at night."

Now I showed this to one of my friends and he said that all this shows is that republicans are paraniod. And I said that if being paranoid means knowing whats out there, how and when to fight it, and seeing the big picture unlike liberals who are too bogged down in details to see the forest through the trees, then yes, I would choose paranioa over "normalty"

the liberals are too caught up in thier own fantasy of some utopian dream where everything would be fine and dandy if bush and republicans didnt exist, and if everyone would exept gays, against gods word. But we conservatives see the great picture, we know whats going on.

Keep dreaming.

Ironic note: The link to this report orginally came from a post on Stevens Site about Conservatism being a degenerative mental illness: http://isbushantichrist.blogspot.com/2005/04/is-conservatism-degenerative-mental.html

Ironic that it eventually proved to him my point. But of course he dismisses it, as he dismisses all truths.

Well, Bush didnt support this, and Bush didnt support that. . .

"he Bush administration will not fund anti-terrorism initiatives that work to secure public transportation because President Bush does not care for those who use public transportation "

Bush didnt support this and bush didnt support that. . . bush didnt say anything about the tsunami. . . bush only gave 2 billion dollars instead of the recomeneded 5 billion. . . Seriously, when will you whiny liberals shut up? I for one am sick and tired of the liberals looking for every chance to make bush look bad. as a president he doesnt have unlimited funds, he cant support everything that comes across. Seriously. Keep the riot down.

Whats the Difference?

"Killing the children from the ghetto through abortion or from sending them to an illegal war in Iraq.What's the difference?"

Heres the difference:

http://www.htmlbible.com/abortstats.htm

Abortion has caused 44 million deaths; more deaths than all the us wars combined. Abortion is the real issue here, it has to be stopped.

The Iraq War

"Tell me that right-wing governments works. Tell me that going to war with Iraq was the right thing. Convince me that there is any possible reasons to relate Iraq with Al-Queda and with 9/11. Tell me that the massive civilian casualities in all the countries America has invaded justifies being able to live in a "safe" society. "

Well its commen sense really. Lets start with your first question. Why was the iraq war the right thing. Well, before 9/11 Saddam was and has before acted as a terrorist. He was becoming very powerful again in his dictatorship. Then 9/11 happens, and who do we look to whos financially aiding the terrorists? Saddam, of course! Some of you will ask me for proof, well, you dont always need proof to see the obvious.

Even John Kerry said "he is and has acted like a terrorist" (John Kerrys actually for the war, the reason he changed his opinion is because he likes to say whatever is popular with dems) So we remove saddam and the terrorist network. Now some of you will say that the fact that just because "Saddam was a bad guy" That it doesnt justify the 100,000 deaths it took to get him out. But remember that saddam tortured his people. Imagine if we left saddam in power, in 20 years, where would he be? Well he would have been a lot more powerful than he is now, killed a lot more than 100,000, But thats just inside iraq. Imagine what military force he would have gained, he would be at a head terrorist position, his forces and al quida would have joined, and would have enough power to make many terrorist attacks, perhaps even challenge our power as a nation. In the Long run Iraq was better off.

Bush made the right decision, he finished what his father started.